- Intel burn test length software#
- Intel burn test length professional#
- Intel burn test length windows#
A modern Windows-NT based operating system (XP and above). Simplifies the process of selecting a test size to use.
Real-time output of results to the screen.ģ. Use the same stress-testing engine that Intel uses to test their productsīefore they are packed and put on shelves for sale.Ģ. Something like 8 minutes Linpack vs 40 hours under Prime95).ģ. Takes less time to tell if your CPU/RAM is unstable than Prime95 (usually
More accurate than Prime95 Small FFTs/Blend (under 圆4 OS).Ģ. Tested by many users on Core i7 9xx, 8xx, i5 7xx, i7 2xxx, AMD 10xxtġ.
Intel burn test length windows#
Tested on Microsoft(R) Windows Vista(tm)/7 X86/X64 SP1
Intel burn test length professional#
Tested on Microsoft(R) Windows XP Professional SP2/SP3, XP Professional Tested on AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82, Intel(R) Core(tm) i5 470-UM, Tested on AMD Phenom II X4 940 Black Edition. Q6600, Intel(R) Pentium(tm) III 550 MHz, AMD Athlon 64(tm) X2 4200+,Īnd AMD Opteron 165 (Working with AMD processors since v1.7). During testing, Windows may not be usable. Note: Xtreme Stress Mode may cause the CPU to heat up more than itĪlready does. Xtreme Stress Mode (Right-click the "Start" button) allows unprecedented Limited to: burned up CPU, fried motherboard, spontaneous room temperature By using this program, youĪgree that neither I nor Intel shall be responsible for including, but not Keep in mind, use this program at your own risk. Make usage of Linpack easier and more practical.
Intel burn test length software#
Load temp under Linpack willīe up to 22*C higher than the competing software Prime95. erful X86/X64 CPU in the world at its knees. Intel(R) is an extremely stressful program that will put even the most pow. The only utilities I've ever found that come as close as possible to 100% TDP are Prime95 v26.6 Small FFT's for thermal testing, which is a steady workload, and Asus RealBench for stability testing, which is a fluctuating workload.Īlthough the topic of Prime95 (with and without AVX) was covered, I would like to have seen RealBench included in your test suite, as it's widely accepted as an excellent utility for testing overall system stability, and uses a realistic AVX workload.A program that simplifies the usage of Intel(R) Linpack. However, since Intel validates their thermal specifications at a steady 100% TDP, it's most appropriate to select utilities that don't overload or underload the CPU. This article provides some excellent comparisons. Since most users test their rigs without a sense of scale for power and temperature, they can't compare apples to apples, especially when combined with major variables such as differences in ambient temperature, hardware configurations and software utilities. Otherwise, great work! I was very pleased to read this article!Ģ0741319 said:As the author of the Intel Temperature Guide - I can fully appreciate how much work went into creating this outstanding article, which has been sorely needed! The only utilities I've ever found that come as close as possible to 100% TDP are Prime95 v26.6 Small FFT's as a steady workload for thermal testing, and Asus RealBench as a fluctuating workload for stability testing.Īlthough the topic of Prime95 (with and without AVX) was covered, I would like to have seen RealBench included in your test suite,since it's widely accepted as an excellent utility for testing overall system stability, and uses a realistic AVX workload. Nevertheless, our results are very similar. The Intel Temperature Guide differs in its approach toward the topic of processor Core temperatures and cooling with respect to Intel's TDP specifications, and distinguishes between steady workloads for thermal testing versus fluctuating workloads for stability testing. This article provides a perspective and some excellent comparisons. As the author of the Intel Temperature Guide - I can fully appreciate how much work went into creating this outstanding article, which has been sorely needed!
0 kommentar(er)
